It all started with a creaky stool in a secondhand bookstore in downtown Napa. I wasn’t looking for anything in particular that foggy Saturday—certainly not a book that would unravel my understanding of love and connection. But then, I saw it: a weathered copy of The Geography of Love by M.F.K. Fisher, its spine slightly peeling and the smell of oak and time rising as I flipped through the pages. Sold for a steep $3.50. Little did I know, those pages would alter how I viewed relationships forever—and no, it wasn’t because of Fisher’s poetic musings on oysters.
How a Book About Food Taught Me About Relationships
M.F.K. Fisher is a celebrated food writer, but The Geography of Love isn’t just about culinary delights. It’s a reflection on human connection through the lens of meals shared, love lost, and the quiet significance of savoring the moment. It’s not labeled a “self-help” book, and yet there it was, helping itself right into my philosophies on love. Fisher didn’t preach; she whispered truths so relatable they pulled me into her world of simmering soups and simmering emotions.
What struck me first was her belief that food and relationships overlap in profound ways. Both require choice, effort, and attention to detail. Fisher writes, “It seems to me that our three basic needs for food, security, and love are so interwoven that we cannot think of one without the others.” Replace “food” with “love,” and that’s a decent description of my last relationship.
But here’s the kicker: I wasn’t just reading about Fisher’s life—I was jolted into reflecting on my own. Did I treat love with the same care as I did a velvety cabernet? Did I rush through relationships the way I sometimes scarf down lunch without tasting it? (Spoiler alert: I did.) Fisher’s writing urged me to slow down, savor, and maybe even give myself the metaphorical time to decant.
Relationships, as Told Through the Five Senses
Fisher reframed relationships for me, not just as emotional or intellectual bonds but as sensorial experiences. The right relationship, she implied, should have the richness of a well-prepared boeuf bourguignon, deeply layered and worth the multi-hour commitment.
Take the sense of taste: Fisher’s attention to flavors taught me that passion—whether on the plate or in the heart—isn’t about excess but balance. Too much salt, and the dish is ruined. Too much push in a romance, and suddenly you’re spiraling down the rabbit hole of late-night relationship check-ins that could’ve been a nap instead. She made me realize that subtlety and patience in love go a long way.
The same goes for touch. In my wine-soaked upbringing, I learned that fine glassware matters—a great pinot doesn’t deserve a plastic solo cup. Similarly, Fisher insisted on cherishing the tactile sensations of life, which called me out on ignoring the small physical intimacies of a relationship. Hand-holding shouldn’t be perfunctory. Chaotic hugs in the kitchen while the pasta water overflows? Those are the moments that matter.
My takeaway? Relationships aren’t built on flashy gestures. They’re constructed—much like Fisher’s meals—with precision, care, and the occasional sprinkle of sea salt when no one’s looking.
My Love Life Pre-Fisher: Let’s Just Say She Would’ve Judged My Entrées
Before reading Fisher, I treated love like a fast-food chain: convenient, familiar, but not exactly farm-to-table. I leaned heavily on what was easy, often settling for lukewarm, overly salted connections because they filled a temporary hunger instead of investing in something—a slow-braised stew, let’s say—that might take longer but nourish me in a deeper way.
The relationship I was in back then (let’s call him “Chad,” which feels appropriate) was all about the instant gratification. Quick plans, fast fixes, zero depth. As long as I didn’t overthink it, everything was fine—until it wasn’t. Here I was, someone who could write lovingly about a crusty baguette for paragraphs but didn’t think twice about skipping the “good bread” when it came to love.
Fisher’s writing made me ask myself: When did I stop demanding depth? When did I stop valuing the connections worth lingering over? Chad ended up being a microwaved leftover of a relationship—fine in a pinch but not something you serve yourself if you care about what’s on your plate (or your heart).
Cooking Up Connection on Fisher’s Terms
If Fisher were a dating coach, she’d offer some solid, sensibly French tips, so allow me to spice them up with a Napa Valley twist. Here’s what I’ve learned since tossing Chad like last week’s kale salad—less wilted, more aspirational:
-
Savor the Journey
Love, like coq au vin, takes time. Don’t rush the marinating process, and don’t settle just because you’re hungry (or bored). Let things unfold naturally, enjoying the subtle shifts and flavors as they emerge. Whether it’s letting a flirtation breathe or having an honest conversation over Merlot, trust the timing. -
Avoid Over-Spicing
Ever been on a first date where someone tries just a little too hard? (Think Guy Fieri energy, but in a bad way.) Relationships don’t need to be overly complicated to be meaningful. Too much flair can mask real flavors—or real connection. Be yourself; let the quality ingredients of who you are shine through. -
Listen to the Palate Cleanser Moments
Have you ever had an amuse-bouche—a small bite designed to reset your taste buds? Fisher reminded me that relationships, too, need palate cleansers. This might mean a solo trip to rediscover yourself or simply leaning into the quiet moments together instead of chasing constant excitement. -
Choose Quality over Quantity
Don’t we all know someone who dabbles in serial dating as though they’re speed-tasting Chardonnay samples at a wine festival? Fisher’s pages whispered to me: fewer samples, richer wines. Quality over quantity isn’t just a rule for a tasting flight—it’s red-letter advice for love. -
Pair Love with the Right Ingredients
Fisher—and wine country—taught me the importance of good pairings. A perfect chocolate mousse sings with grenache; a gentle, tender relationship pairs beautifully with honesty. Pay attention to compatibility, and don’t force things that don’t belong together. (I once tried to pair a crisp Chardonnay with barbecue sauce. Don’t make my mistakes—in or out of the kitchen.)
Embracing My Inner Fisher
Since closing that book, I’ve carried Fisher’s philosophies into not only my relationships but my daily rituals. A quiet breakfast can feel as sacred as a first date. Venting to my best friend over a shared cheese plate has become elevated to a spiritual experience. And yes, my approach to love now mirrors how I view wine: always evolving, deserving respect, and rarely perfect—but worth savoring when you find the right one.
So, would Fisher approve of my current relationship? Not to overshare, but he’s a French press kind of guy, which bodes well for his long-term potential. Like a good Bordeaux, we’re aging—thrillingly, patiently—and I’ll toast to that.
